TY - JOUR
T1 - Spinal flexibility is an important factor for improvement in spinal and knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty
T2 - Evaluation using a whole body EOS system
AU - Kim, Seong Chan
AU - Kim, Joo Sung
AU - Choi, Han Gyeol
AU - Kim, Tae Woo
AU - Lee, Yong Seuk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the relationship between lumbosacral flexibility and the effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on whole‐body alignment; and (2) to determine the prerequisites of the adjacent joints for successful TKA. A total of 116 patients (156 cases) who had whole‐body X‐ray and flexion‐extension lumbar radiograph available were enrolled. For the sagittal alignment evaluation, hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7 plumb line‐sacrum distance (SVA) were evaluated on the whole‐body radiographs. Lumbar flexibility (LF) was evaluated using the flexion‐extension lumbar radiographs, and pelvic flexibility (PF) was evaluated using the pelvic incidence (PI). The disparities in the knee joint between postoperative passive motion and weight-bearing posture were assessed. LF was significantly correlated with ΔLL and ΔSVA (LL: p = 0.039, SVA: p = 0.040; Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC): −0.206 and 0.205, respectively). There were correlations between PF and ΔSS (p < 0.001, PCC: −0.362), and between the disparity and LF (p = 0.005, PCC = −0.275). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that LF was significantly associated with the presence of disparity (p = 0.005, β = −0.205). LF is an important factor for improved spinal and lower limb alignment after TKA. Additionally, reduced LF may result in knee joint disparity between passive extension and standing extension status. Therefore, surgeons should consider spinopelvic alignment, including lower limb alignment preoperatively, to be able to predict possible changes in whole‐body alignment following TKA.
AB - The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the relationship between lumbosacral flexibility and the effects of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on whole‐body alignment; and (2) to determine the prerequisites of the adjacent joints for successful TKA. A total of 116 patients (156 cases) who had whole‐body X‐ray and flexion‐extension lumbar radiograph available were enrolled. For the sagittal alignment evaluation, hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7 plumb line‐sacrum distance (SVA) were evaluated on the whole‐body radiographs. Lumbar flexibility (LF) was evaluated using the flexion‐extension lumbar radiographs, and pelvic flexibility (PF) was evaluated using the pelvic incidence (PI). The disparities in the knee joint between postoperative passive motion and weight-bearing posture were assessed. LF was significantly correlated with ΔLL and ΔSVA (LL: p = 0.039, SVA: p = 0.040; Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC): −0.206 and 0.205, respectively). There were correlations between PF and ΔSS (p < 0.001, PCC: −0.362), and between the disparity and LF (p = 0.005, PCC = −0.275). Linear regression analysis demonstrated that LF was significantly associated with the presence of disparity (p = 0.005, β = −0.205). LF is an important factor for improved spinal and lower limb alignment after TKA. Additionally, reduced LF may result in knee joint disparity between passive extension and standing extension status. Therefore, surgeons should consider spinopelvic alignment, including lower limb alignment preoperatively, to be able to predict possible changes in whole‐body alignment following TKA.
KW - EOS
KW - Knee
KW - Osteoarthritis
KW - Sagittal alignment
KW - Spinal flexibility
KW - Total knee arthroplasty
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85114070949
U2 - 10.3390/jcm9113498
DO - 10.3390/jcm9113498
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114070949
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 9
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 11
M1 - 3498
ER -